Consumers’ Institute wants to ban drug ads

The Consumers’ Institute has decided to celebrate World Consumer Rights Day by calling for consumers’ rights to be curtailed, specifically the right to be informed about pharmaceuticals via television advertising.

ViagraConsumers International, the organisation behind the campaign internationally, has a page dedicated to explaining why direct-to-consumer (DTC) drug advertising is unethical. That page has a single heading: “Fuelled by profit”. Shocking stuff.

In the culmination of several seconds of research, Consumer research writer Belinda Allan determines, “DTCA’s primary objective, no matter what gloss is placed on the information, is to sell more product.” Another shocking revelation.

The comment above about calling for consumers’ rights to be curtailed is tongue in cheek - there is no such right. You can’t force a TV station show you these advertisements. There is a genuine right that is being curtailed here though and that is the right of drug manufacturers to speak about their products.

These products have been approved by MedSafe and are governed by the Medicines Act, advertising claims are governed by the Fair Trading Act, these drugs are legal to buy (on prescription), it’s legal to ask your doctor for them, it’s legal for your doctor to tell you about them. It is preposterous to say that it should be illegal for the manufacturer to tell people they exist and what they’re used for.

Setting aside the outrageous attempt to gag pharamceuticals companies, what is the practical benefit of a ban? The only thing these advertisements can do is encourage people to ask their doctor for a particular drug, a perfectly legal activity. And if the doctor doesn’t think that a drug is suitable for any given patient that’s the end of it - no prescription, no sale.

Perhaps these “consumers’ rights” groups should take off their anti-corporate blinkers for a moment, stop trying to squash people’s right to express themselves, and spend more time worrying about what consumers actually want. A recent report on the topic from the Foundation for Advertising Research concludes:

From a consumer viewpoint DTCA has many advantages and few disadvantages. Consumers do not share the concerns expressed by critics of DTCA of consumer safety, increased costs, patient-doctor relationships and medicalisation. Instead they believe DTCA enables them to obtain useful information, a sense of empowerment, a prompt to obtain medical advice and a basis for meaningful and more informed discussions with their doctor about their healthcare.

These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • ScoopIt
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • Reddit
  • blogmarks
  • NewsVine
  • StumbleUpon
  • SphereIt

5 Responses to “Consumers’ Institute wants to ban drug ads”

  1. cearta.ie » Blog Archive » Consumers’ Days Says:

    […] In the week that the EU Commission adopts a Consumer Policy Strategy for 2007-2013 (largely welcomed (pdf) by the European Consumers’ Organisation (BEUC)), and the Consumer Protection Bill, 2007 (noted here) wends its way through Committee stage in the Dáil (just in time for enactment before the general election, one hopes), it seems that today (15 March 2007 - the Ides of March, methinks) is World Consumer Rights Day (noted here by the NZ Free Speech blog Section 14; for more background see days that matter and also here), and tomorrow (16 March 2007) is the 9th European Consumer Day. […]

  2. yniwqctgdl Says:

    Hello! Good Site! Thanks you! aukirdeirwuqtn

  3. adult hidden cam Says:

    adult hidden cam

    Section 14 » Blog Archive » Consumers’ Institute wants to ban drug ads

  4. Daniel Says:

    I couldn’t understand some parts of this article Institute wants to ban drug ads, but I guess I just need to check some more resources regarding this, because it sounds interesting.

  5. free gallery Says:

    sound good, respect!
    i like ur blog, write more..

Leave a Reply